The Rajasthan High Court recently ruled on a case involving delayed income tax returns, emphasizing taxpayers the importance of “mens rea,” or guilty mind, in such matters. Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand noted that in the absence of mens rea, a taxpayer cannot be held guilty under section 276 CC of the Income Tax Act.
The case stemmed from a complaint filed by the Income Tax Officer against the respondent-taxpayer under section 276 CC. The allegation was that the taxpayer failed to file their Income Tax Returns (ITR) for the assessment year 1978-79 by the specified deadline of July 31, 1978, and instead filed them on December 31, 1980.
Proceedings under section 271(1) of the Income Tax Act were initiated against the taxpayer on December 31, 1981, resulting in a penalty of Rs 2200. Subsequently, charges were brought against the taxpayer under section 276 CC, to which the taxpayer pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The taxpayer argued that although there was a delay in filing the ITR, there was no intent to delay, invoking the principle of mens rea.
The department contended that the taxpayer’s delay in filing the ITR was over 28 months and argued that there was no justification for forgiving the charges against the taxpayer.
In its judgment, the court considered the addition of Section 278E to the Income Tax Act by the Tax Law Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1986. This section, effective from September 10, 1986, presumes the presence of a “culpable mental state” in prosecutions requiring such a mental state, shifting the burden to the accused to prove otherwise.
The court observed that to establish guilt under section 276 CC, the complainant must prove the mens rea of the accused for not filing taxes or attempting to evade them. In this case, the respondent provided detailed reasons for the delayed filing of the ITRs and subsequently paid the entire tax amount along with a penalty.
The court concluded that the petitioner failed to prove that the respondent had the requisite mens rea to evade tax payment. Moreover, the income tax department did not provide sufficient evidence to establish the guilt of the respondent beyond a reasonable doubt.
In essence, the ruling underscores the principle that in cases of delayed tax filings, the presence of mens rea is crucial for establishing guilt, and the burden of proof lies with the prosecution to demonstrate this guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
🚀 Ready to level up your finances? Say goodbye to tax woes with Savingz! 🎉
Our app offers effortless tax planning & filing, saving high-income earners like you time and money.
Join now for exclusive CA👩🏻💼 call with us and start maximizing your wealth today! 💰📲 Download Our App Link: https://savz.live/app
Savings starts with Savingz.
A word from our Founder 🚀
